|
Socrates
469 - 399 B.C.

The Greek philosopher and logician Socrates was an important
formative influence on Plato and had a profound effect on
ancient philosophy.
Socrates
was the son of Sophroniscus, an Athenian stone mason and
sculptor. He learned his father's craft and apparently practiced
it for many years before devoting his time almost completely to
intellectual interests. Details of his early life are scanty,
although he appears to have had no more than an ordinary Greek
education. He did, however, take a keen interest in the works of
the natural philosophers, and Plato (Parmenides, 127C) records
the fact that Socrates met Zeno of Elea and Parmenides on their
trip to Athens, which probably took place about 450 B.C.
Socrates wrote nothing; therefore evidence for his life and
activities must come from the writings of Plato and Xenophon. It
is likely that neither of these presents a completely accurate
picture of him, but Plato's Apology, Crito, Phaedo, and
Symposium contain details which must be close to fact.
From the Apology we learn that Socrates was well known around
Athens, that uncritical thinkers linked him with the rest of the
Sophists, that he fought in at least three military campaigns
for the city, and that he attracted to his circle large numbers
of young men who delighted in seeing their pretentious elders
refuted by Socrates. His notoriety in Athens was sufficient for
the Athenian comic poet Aristophanes to lampoon him in The
Clouds, although the Socrates who appears there bears little
resemblance to the dialectician in Plato's writings. His
endurance and prowess in military campaigns are attested by
Alcibiades in the Symposium. He tells of Socrates's valor in
battle, which allowed Alcibiades to escape when he was in a
perilous situation. He also recounts an incident which reveals
Socrates's habit of falling into a kind of trance while
thinking. One morning Socrates wandered a short distance off
from the other men to concentrate on a problem. By noon a small
crowd had gathered, and by evening a group had come with their
bedding to spend the night watching him. At the break of day, he
offered up a prayer to the sun and went about his usual
activities.
In addition to these anecdotes about Socrates's peculiar
character, the Symposium provides details regarding his physical
appearance. He was short and Silenus-like, quite the opposite of
what was considered graceful and beautiful in the Athens of his
time. He was also poor and had only the barest necessities of
life. He was not ascetic, however, for he accepted the lavish
hospitality of the wealthy on occasion (Agathon, the successful
tragic poet, was host to the illustrious group in the Symposium)
and proved himself capable of besting the others not only at
their esoteric and sophistic sport of making impromptu speeches
on the god Eros but also in holding his wine. Socrates's
physical ugliness was no bar to his appeal. Alcibiades asserts
in the same dialogue that Socrates made him feel deep shame and
humiliation over his failure to live up to the high standards of
justice and truth. He had this same effect on countless others.
His Thought
There was a strong religious side to Socrates's character and
thought which constantly revealed itself in spite of his
penchant for exposing the ridiculous conclusions to which
uncritical acceptance of the ancient myths might lead. His words
and actions in the Apology, Crito, Phaedo, and Symposium reveal
a deep reverence for Athenian religious customs and a sincere
regard for divinity. Indeed, it was a divine voice which
Socrates claimed to hear within himself on important occasions
in his life. It was not a voice which gave him positive
instructions, but instead warned him when he was about to go
astray. He recounts, in his defense before the Athenian court,
the story of his friend Chaerephon, who was told by the Delphic
Oracle that Socrates was the wisest of men. That statement
puzzled Socrates, he says, for no one was more aware of the
extent of his own ignorance than he himself, but he determined
to see the truth of the god's words. After questioning those who
had a reputation for wisdom and who considered themselves, wise,
he concluded that he was wiser than they because he could
recognize his ignorance while they, who were equally ignorant,
thought themselves wise. He thus confirmed the truth of the
god's statement.
Socrates was famous for his method of argumentation. His "irony"
was an important part of that method and surely helped account
for the appeal which he had for the young and the disfavor in
which he was held by many Athenians. An example comes from the
Apology. Meletus had accused Socrates of corrupting the youth.
Socrates begins by asking if Meletus considers the improvement
of youth important. He replies that he does, whereupon Socrates
asks who is capable of improving the young. The laws, says
Meletus, and Socrates asks him to name a person who knows the
laws. Meletus responds that the judges there present know the
laws, whereupon Socrates asks if all who are present are able to
instruct and improve youth or whether only a few can. Meletus
replies that all of them are capable of such a task, which
forces Meletus to confess that other groups of Athenians, such
as the Senate and the Assembly, and indeed all Athenians are
capable of instructing and improving the youth. All except
Socrates, that is. Socrates then starts a parallel set of
questions regarding the instruction and improvement of horses
and other animals. Is it true that all men are capable of
training horses, or only those men with special qualifications
and experience? Meletus, realizing the absurdity of his
position, does not answer, but Socrates answers for him and
asserts that if he does not care enough about the youth of
Athens to have given adequate thought to who might instruct and
improve them, he has no right to accuse Socrates of corrupting
them.
Thus the Socratic method of argumentation begins with
commonplace questions which lead the opponent to believe that
the questioner is a simpleton, but ends in a complete reversal.
It is a method not calculated to win friends, especially when
used in public.
Socrates's true contributions to the development of ancient
thought are difficult to assess. Plato's dialogues, although
they are our single most important source, are not entirely
reliable because Socrates is used, especially in the later
dialogues, merely as a mouthpiece. It is probable, however, that
the Socrates we find in the Apology Crito, and a few of the
other early dialogues represents a fair approximation of the man
and his thinking. Thus his chief contributions lie not in the
construction of an elaborate system but in clearing away the
false common beliefs and in leading men to an awareness of their
own ignorance, from which position they may begin to discover
the truth. Socrates's contribution, then, was primarily the
negative one of exposing fallacies, but equally important was
the magnetism of his personality and the effect which he had on
the people he met. It was his unique combination of dialectical
skill and magnetic attractiveness to the youth of Athens which
gave his opponents their opportunity to bring him to trial in
399 B.C.
His Death
Meletus, Lycon, and Anytus charged Socrates with impiety and
with corrupting the youth of the city. Since prosecution and
defense speeches were made by the principals in Athenian legal
practice, Socrates spoke in his own behalf. It is uncertain if
the charges were the result of his associations with the Thirty
or resulted from personal pique. Callias, Plato's uncle, had
been the leader of the unpopular Thirty, but it is difficult to
imagine that Socrates could have been considered a collaborator
when in fact he risked death by refusing to be implicated in
their crimes. He had, however, made a great number of enemies
for himself over the years through his self-appointed role as
the "gadfly" of Athens, and it is probable that popular
misunderstanding and animosity toward his activities helped lead
to his conviction. His defense speech was not in the least
conciliatory. After taking up the charges and showing how they
were false, he proposed that the city should honour him as it
did Olympic victors. He was convicted and sentenced to death.
Plato's Crito tells of Crito's attempts to persuade Socrates to
flee the prison (Crito had bribed the jailer, as was customary),
but Socrates, in an allegorical dialogue between himself and the
Laws of Athens, reveals his devotion to the city and his
obligation to obey its decrees even if they lead to his death.
In the Phaedo, Plato recounts Socrates's discussion of the
immortality of the soul; and at the end of that dialogue, one of
the most moving and dramatic scenes in ancient literature,
Socrates takes the hemlock prepared for him while his friends
sit helplessly by. He died reminding Crito that he owes a cock
to Aesculapius.
Socrates was the most colourful figure in the history of ancient
philosophy. His fame was widespread in his own time, and his
name soon became a household word although he professed no
extraordinary wisdom, constructed no philosophical system,
established no school, and founded no sect. His influence on the
course of ancient philosophy, through Plato, the Cynics, and
less directly, Aristotle, is incalculable.
~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~
Socrates was a Classical Greek philosopher. The most reliable
source of information concerning Socrates is Plato. However,
classical scholars disagree as to whether a historically
accurate portrayal of Socrates can be extracted from any of the
sources. Even Plato is alleged to create an incompatible
portrayal of Socrates: his dialogues portray Socrates as a
teacher who denies having disciples, as a man of reason who
obeys a divine voice in his head, and a pious man who is
executed for the state's own expediency; Socrates disparages the
pleasures of the senses, yet is excited by beauty; he is devoted
to the education of the citizens of Athens, yet indifferent to
his own sons.
Life
Details about Socrates are derived from three contemporary
sources: the dialogues of Plato and Xenophon (associates or
students of Socrates), and the plays of Aristophanes. There is
no evidence that Socrates himself published any writings. He has
been depicted by some scholars, including Eric Havelock and
Walter Ong, as a champion of oral modes of communication,
standing up at the dawn of writing against its haphazard
diffusion.
Aristophanes' play The Clouds portrays Socrates as a clown who
teaches his students how to bamboozle their way out of debt.
Most of Aristophanes' works, however, function as parodies.
Thus, one should not take his portrayal of Socrates at face
value.
According to Plato, Socrates' father was Sophroniscus and his
mother Phaenarete, a midwife. Socrates married Xanthippe, who
was much younger than her husband. She bore him three sons,
Lamprocles, Sophroniscus and Menexenus. His friend Crito
criticized him for abandoning his sons when he refused to try to
escape before his execution.
It is unclear how Socrates earned a living. According to Timon
of Phlius and later sources, Socrates took over the profession
of stonemasonry from his father. There was a tradition in
antiquity, not credited by modern scholarship, that Socrates
crafted the statues of the Three Graces, which stood near the
Acropolis until the second century AD. There is evidence which
indicates that Socrates never engaged in a profession: In
Xenophon's Symposium, Socrates is reported as saying he devotes
himself only to what he regards as the most important art or
occupation: discussing philosophy. Aristophanes portrays
Socrates as accepting payment for teaching and running a sophist
school with Chaerephon, in The Clouds, while in Plato's Apology
and Symposium and in Xenophon's accounts, Socrates explicitly
denies accepting payment for teaching. More specifically, in the
Apology Socrates cites his poverty as proof that he is not a
teacher.
Several of Plato's dialogues refer to Socrates' military
service. Socrates says he served in the Athenian army during
three campaigns: at Potidaea, Amphipolis, and Delium. In the
Symposium Alcibiades describes Socrates' valor in the battles of
Potidaea and Delium, recounting how Socrates saved his life in
the former battle, although killing many of his troops in the
process. Socrates' exceptional service at Delium is also
mentioned in the Laches, by the general the dialogue is named
after. In the Apology Socrates compares his military service to
his courtroom troubles, and says that anyone on the jury who
thinks he ought to retreat from philosophy must also think that
soldiers should retreat when it looks like they will be killed
in battle.
The trial and execution of Socrates was the climax of his career
and a central event in the dialogues of Plato.
Socrates admits in this series of dialogues that he could have
avoided the trial by abandoning philosophy and going home to
mind his own business. After his conviction, he could have
avoided the death penalty by escaping with the help of his
friends. The reason for his cooperation with the state's mandate
forms a valuable philosophical insight in its own right, and is
best articulated by the dialogues themselves, especially in his
dialogue with Crito.
Socrates lived during the time of the transition from the height
of the Athenian Hegemony to its decline with the defeat by
Sparta and its allies in the Peloponnesian War. At a time when
Athens was seeking to stabilize and recover from its humiliating
defeat, the Athenian public may have been entertaining doubts
about democracy as an efficient form of government. Socrates
appears to have been a critic of democracy, and his trial is
interpreted by some scholars to be an expression of political
infighting.
Despite claiming death-defying loyalty to his city, Socrates'
pursuit of virtue and his strict adherence to truth clashed with
the current course of Athenian politics and society. Here it is
telling to refer to Thucydides: "Applause, in a word, went to
one who got in first with some evil act, and to him who cheered
on another to attempt some crime that he was not thinking of."
He praises Sparta, arch rival to Athens, directly and indirectly
in various dialogs. But perhaps the most historically accurate
of Socrates' offences to the city was his position as a social
and moral critic. Rather than upholding a status quo and
accepting the development of immorality within his region,
Socrates worked to undermine the collective notion of "might
makes right" so common to Greece during this period. Plato
refers to Socrates as the gadfly of the state, insofar as he
irritated the establishment with considerations of justice and
the pursuit of goodness. His attempts to improve the Athenian's
sense of justice may have been the source of his execution.
According to Plato's Apology, Socrates' life as the "gadfly" of
Athens began when his friend Chaerephon asked the oracle at
Delphi if anyone was wiser than Socrates; the Oracle responded
that none was wiser than Socrates. Socrates believed that what
the Oracle had said was a riddle, considering there is no record
of the oracle ever giving individuals praise for their
achievements or knowledge. He proceeded to test the riddle
through approaching men who were considered to be wise by the
people of Athens. He questioned the men of Athens about their
knowledge of good, beauty, and virtue. Finding that they knew
nothing and yet believed themselves to know much, Socrates came
to the conclusion that he was wise only insofar as "that what I
don't know, I don't think I know." Socrates' paradoxical wisdom
made the prominent Athenians he publicly questioned look
foolish, turning them against him and leading to accusations of
wrongdoing. Socrates defended his role as a gadfly until the
end: at his trial, when Socrates is asked to propose his own
punishment, he suggests a wage paid by the government instead,
to finance the time he spends as Athens' benefactor.
He was nevertheless found guilty of corrupting the minds of the
youth of Athens and sentenced to death by drinking a mix of the
poisonous hemlock. Socrates' death is described at the end of
Plato's Phaedo. Socrates turned down the pleas of Crito to
attempt an escape from prison. After drinking the poison, he was
instructed to walk around until his limbs felt heavy. After he
lay down, the man who administered the poison pinched his foot.
Socrates could no longer feel his legs. The numbness slowly
crept up his body until it reached his heart. Shortly before
dying, Socrates spoke his last words to Crito saying, "Crito, we
owe a cock to Asclepius. Please, don't forget to pay the debt."
Asclepius was the Greek god for curing illness, and it is likely
that Socrates' last words were implied to mean that death is the
cure, and freedom, of the soul from the body. The Roman
philosopher Seneca attempted to emulate Socrates' death by
hemlock when forced to commit suicide by the Emperor Nero.
According to Xenophon and Plato, Socrates had an opportunity to
escape, as his followers were able to bribe the prison guards.
After escaping, Socrates would have had to flee from Athens.
However, Socrates refused to escape for several reasons. 1. He
believed that such a flight would indicate a fear of death,
which he believed no true philosopher has. 2. Even if he did
leave, he, and his teaching, would fare no better in another
country. 3. Having knowingly agreed to live under the city's
laws, he implicitly subjected himself to the possibility of
being accused of crimes by its citizens and judged guilty by its
jury. To do otherwise would have caused him to break his
'contract' with the state, and by so doing harming it, an act
contrary to Socratic principle. The full reasoning behind his
refusal to flee is the main subject of the Crito.
According to Xenophon's story of Socrates' defense to the jury,
Socrates purposefully gives a defiant defense to the jury
because "he believed he would be better off dead." Xenophon's
explanation goes on to describe a defense by Socrates that
explains the rigors of old age, and how Socrates will be glad to
circumvent these by being sentenced to death. It is also
understood that Socrates not only wished to avoid the pains of
old age, but also to die because he "actually believed the right
time had come for him to die."
Philosophy
Socratic method
Perhaps his most important contribution to Western thought is
his dialectic method of inquiry, known as the Socratic Method or
method of elenchos, which he largely applied to the examination
of key moral concepts such as the Good and Justice. It was first
described by Plato in the Socratic Dialogues. To solve a
problem, you would ask a question and when finding the answer,
you would also have an answer to your problem. This led to the
beginning of the Scientific Method, in which the first step says
to name the problem in the form of a question. For this,
Socrates is customarily regarded as the father of political
philosophy and ethics or moral philosophy, and as a fountainhead
of all the main themes in Western philosophy in general. (The
method may have been suggested by Zeno of Elea, but Socrates
refined it and applied it to ethical problems.)
In this method, a series of questions are posed to help a person
or group to determine their underlying beliefs and the extent of
their knowledge. The Socratic method is a negative method of
hypothesis elimination, in that better hypotheses are found by
steadily identifying and eliminating those which lead to
contradictions. It was designed to force one to examine one's
own beliefs and the validity of such beliefs. In fact, Socrates
once said, "I know you won't believe me, but the highest form of
Human Excellence is to question oneself and others."
Philosophical beliefs
The beliefs of Socrates, as opposed to those of Plato, are
difficult to discern. Little in the way of concrete evidence
demarcates the two. The lengthy theories given in most of the
dialogues are those of Plato, and it is thought that Plato so
adapted the Socratic style as to make the literary character and
the philosopher himself impossible to distinguish. Others argue
that he did have his own theories and beliefs, but there is much
controversy over what these might have been, owing to the
difficulty of separating Socrates from Plato and the difficulty
of interpreting even the dramatic writings concerning Socrates.
Consequently, distinguishing the philosophical beliefs of
Socrates from those of Plato and Xenophon is not easy and it
must be remembered that what is attributed to Socrates might
more closely reflect the specific concerns of these thinkers.
If anything in general can be said about the philosophical
beliefs of Socrates, it is that he was morally, intellectually,
and politically at odds with his fellow Athenians. When he is on
trial for heresy and corrupting the minds of the youth of
Athens, he uses his method of elenchos to demonstrate to the
jurors that their moral values are wrong-headed. He tells them
that they are concerned with their families, careers, and
political responsibilities when they ought to be worried about
the "welfare of their souls." Socrates's belief in the
immortality of the soul, and his conviction that the gods had
singled him out as a divine emissary seemed to provoke if not
annoyance, at least ridicule. Socrates also questioned the
Sophistic doctrine that arete (that is, virtue) can be taught.
He liked to observe that successful fathers (such as the
prominent military general Pericles) did not produce sons of
their own quality. Socrates argued that moral excellence was
more a matter of divine bequest than parental nurture. This
belief may have contributed to his lack of anxiety about the
future of his own sons.
Socrates frequently says that his ideas are not his own, but his
teachers'. He mentions several influences: Prodicus the rhetor
and Anaxagoras the scientist. Perhaps surprisingly, Socrates
claims to have been deeply influenced by two women besides his
mother. He says that Diotima, a witch and priestess from
Mantinea taught him all he knows about eros, or love, and that
Aspasia, the mistress of Pericles, taught him the art of funeral
orations. John Burnet argued that his principal teacher was the
Anaxagorean Archelaus but that his ideas were as Plato described
them; Eric A. Havelock, on the other hand, considered Socrates'
association with the Anaxagoreans to be evidence of Plato's
philosophical separation from Socrates.
Knowledge
Socrates seems to have often said that his wisdom was limited to
an awareness of his own ignorance. Socrates may have believed
that wrongdoing was a consequence of ignorance, that those who
did wrong knew no better. The one thing Socrates consistently
claimed to have knowledge of was "the art of love" which he
connected with the concept of "the love of wisdom", i.e.,
philosophy. He never actually claimed to be wise, only to
understand the path that a lover of wisdom must take in pursuing
it. It is debatable whether Socrates believed that humans (as
opposed to gods like Apollo) could actually become wise. On the
one hand, he drew a clear line between human ignorance and ideal
knowledge; on the other, Plato's Symposium (Diotima's Speech)
and Republic (Allegory of the Cave) describe a method for
ascending to wisdom.
In Plato's Theaetetus Socrates compares himself to a true
matchmaker, as distinguished from a panderer. This distinction
is echoed in Xenophon's Symposium, when Socrates jokes about his
certainty of being able to make a fortune, if he chose to
practice the art of pandering. For his part as a philosophical
interlocutor, he leads his respondent to a clearer conception of
wisdom, although he claims that he is not himself a teacher
(Apology). His role, he claims, is more properly to be
understood as analogous to a midwife. Socrates explains that he
is himself barren of theories, but knows how to bring the
theories of others to birth and determine whether they are
worthy or mere "wind eggs". Perhaps significantly, he points out
that midwives are barren due to age, and women who have never
given birth are unable to become midwives; a truly barren woman
would have no experience or knowledge of birth and would be
unable to separate the worthy infants from those that should be
left on the hillside to be exposed. To judge this, the midwife
must have experience and knowledge of what she is judging.
Virtue
Socrates believed that the best way for people to live was to
focus on self-development rather than the pursuit of material
wealth. He always invited others to try to concentrate more on
friendships and a sense of true community, for Socrates felt
that this was the best way for people to grow together as a
populace. His actions lived up to this: in the end, Socrates
accepted his death sentence when most thought he would simply
leave Athens, as he felt he could not run away from or go
against the will of his community; as mentioned above, his
reputation for valour on the battlefield was without reproach.
The idea that humans possessed certain virtues formed a common
thread in Socrates' teachings. These virtues represented the
most important qualities for a person to have, foremost of which
were the philosophical or intellectual virtues. Socrates
stressed that "virtue was the most valuable of all possessions;
the ideal life was spent in search of the Good. Truth lies
beneath the shadows of existence, and that it is the job of the
philosopher to show the rest how little they really know."
Ultimately, virtue relates to the form of the Good; to truly be
good and not just act with "right opinion"; one must come to
know the unchanging Good in itself. In the Republic, he
describes the "divided line", a continuum of ignorance to
knowledge with the Good on top of it all; only at the top of
this line do we find true good and the knowledge of such.
Politics
It is often argued that Socrates believed "ideals belong in a
world that only the wise man can understand", making the
philosopher the only type of person suitable to govern others.
According to Plato's account, Socrates was in no way subtle
about his particular beliefs on government. He openly objected
to the democracy that ran Athens during his adult life. It was
not only Athenian democracy: Socrates objected to any form of
government that did not conform to his ideal of a perfect
republic led by philosophers, and Athenian government was far
from that. It is, however, possible that Plato's account is
coloured here by his own views. During the last years of
Socrates' life, Athens was in continual flux due to political
upheaval. Democracy was at last overthrown by a junta known as
the Thirty Tyrants, led by Plato's relative, Critias, who had
been a student of Socrates. The Tyrants ruled for about a year
before the Athenian democracy was reinstated, at which point it
declared an amnesty for all recent events. Four years later, it
acted to silence the voice of Socrates.
This argument is often denied, and the question is one of the
biggest philosophical debates when trying to determine what,
exactly, it was that Socrates believed. The strongest argument
of those who claim that Socrates did not actually believe in the
idea of philosopher kings is Socrates' constant refusal to enter
into politics or participate in government of any sort; he often
stated that he could not look into other's matters or tell
people how to live their lives when he did not yet understand
how to live his own. He believed he was a philosopher engaged in
the pursuit of Truth, and did not claim to know it fully.
Socrates' acceptance of his death sentence, after his conviction
by the Boule (Senate), can also be seen to support this view. It
is often claimed that much of the anti-democratic leanings are
from Plato, who was never able to overcome his disgust at what
was done to his teacher. In any case, it is clear that Socrates
thought that the rule of the Thirty Tyrants was at least as
objectionable as democracy; when called before them to assist in
the arrest of a fellow Athenian, Socrates refused and narrowly
escaped death before the Tyrants were overthrown. He did however
fulfill his duty to serve as prytanis when a trial of a group of
generals who presided over a disastrous naval campaign were
judged; even then he maintained an uncompromising attitude,
being one of those who refused to proceed in a manner not
supported by the laws, despite intense pressure. Judging by his
actions, he considered the rule of the Thirty Tyrants less
legitimate than that of the democratic senate who sentenced him
to death.
Mysticism
In the dialogues of Plato, Socrates often seems to purport a
mystical side, discussing reincarnation and the mystery
religions; however, this is generally attributed to Plato.
Regardless, this cannot be dismissed out of hand, as we cannot
be sure of the differences between the views of Plato and
Socrates; in addition, there seem to be some corollaries in the
works of Xenophon. In the culmination of the philosophic path as
discussed in Plato's Symposium and Republic, one comes to the
Sea of Beauty or to the sight of the form of the Good in an
experience akin to mystical revelation; only then can one become
wise. (In the Symposium, Socrates credits his speech on the
philosophic path to his teacher, the priestess Diotima, who is
not even sure if Socrates is capable of reaching the highest
mysteries.) In the Meno, he refers to the Eleusinian Mysteries,
telling Meno he would understand Socrates' answers better if
only he could stay for the initiations next week. Further
confusions result from the nature of these sources, insofar as
the Platonic dialogues are arguably the work of an
artist-philosopher, whose meaning does not volunteer itself to
the passive reader nor again the lifelong scholar. Plato himself
was a playwright before taking up the study of philosophy. His
works are, indeed, dialogues; Plato's choice of this, the medium
of Sophocles, Euripides, and the fictions of theatre, may
reflect the interpretable nature of his writings. What is more,
the first word of nearly all Plato's works is a, or the,
significant term for that respective study, and is used with the
commonly approved definition in mind. Finally, the Phaedrus and
the Symposium each allude to Socrates' coy delivery of
philosophic truths in conversation; the Socrates of the Phaedrus
goes so far as to demand such dissembling and mystery in all
writing. The mysticism we often find in Plato, appearing here
and there and couched in some enigmatic tract of symbol and
irony, is often at odds with the mysticism that Plato's Socrates
expounds in some other dialogue. These mystical resolutions to
thitherto rigorous inquiries and analyses fail to satisfy caring
readers, without fail. Whether they would fail to satisfy
readers who understood them is another question, and will not,
in all probability, ever be resolved.
Perhaps the most interesting facet of this is Socrates' reliance
on what the Greeks called his "daemonic sign", an averting inner
voice that Socrates heard only when he was about to make a
mistake. It was this sign that prevented Socrates from entering
into politics. In the Phaedrus, we are told Socrates considered
this to be a form of "divine madness", the sort of insanity that
is a gift from the gods and gives us poetry, mysticism, love,
and even philosophy itself. Alternately, the sign is often taken
to be what we would call "intuition"; however, Socrates'
characterization of the phenomenon as "daemonic" suggests that
its origin is divine, mysterious, and independent of his own
thoughts.
An Ahmadiyyah Scholar, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, (the Fourth Caliph of
the Ahmadiyyat Movement in Islam) argues that Socrates
experienced what can be called a prophetic revelation. He writes
in his book, Revelation, Rationality, Knowledge & Truth, that
"Socrates seems to have a very personalized and intense
relationship with the Supreme Being. His very personality is
built on the pattern of the messengers of God."
JACANA HOME PAGE
|
CLASSIC VIDEO CLIPS
|
JACANA ASTRONOMY SITE
JACANA PHOTO LIBRARY |
OLD MAUN PHOTO GALLERY |
MAUN PHONE DIRECTORY
FREE FONTS |
PIC OF THE DAY
|
GENERAL LIBRARY |
MAP LIBRARY |
TECHNICAL LIBRARY
HOUSE PLANS LIBRARY
|
MAUN E-MAIL, WEBSITE & SKYPE LIST
|
BOTSWANA GPS CO-ORDINATES
MAUN SAFARI WEB LINKS |
FREE SOFTWARE |
JACANA WEATHER PAGE
JACANA CROSSWORD LIBRARY |
JACANA CARTOON PAGE |
DEMOTIVATIONAL POSTERS
This web page was last updated on:
16 December, 2008
              |