|
Burrhus Frederic Skinner
1904-1990

The American experimental psychologist Burrhus Frederic Skinner
became the chief exponent of that form of behaviourism known as
operationism, or operant behaviourism.
Born in
Susquehanna, PA, B. F. Skinner attended Hamilton College. He
then went to Harvard, where he received a master's degree in
1930 and a doctorate in experimental psychology in 1931. In 1936
he began teaching at the University of Minnesota, the same year
he married Yvonne Blue; they had two daughters.
In Skinner's first book, Behaviour of Organisms (1938), he
"clung doggedly to the term reflex, thus allowing his immediate
psychological roots in classical or early behaviourism." A
Guggenheim fellowship enabled him to begin writing Verbal
Behaviour in 1941. He continued on the fellowship through 1945,
finishing most of the manuscript. In 1947 he gave a course at
Columbia University and the William James Lecture at Harvard,
both based on Verbal Behaviour, which, however, he put off
publishing for 20 years. Walden Two (1948) described his notions
on a feasible design for (utopian) community living.
In 1954 Skinner became chairman of the Department of Psychology
at Indiana University and published "Are Theories of Learning
Necessary?" Conferences begun at Indiana culminated in 1958 in a
new journal, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour.
Air Crib and Skinner Box
Toward the end of World War II, with the birth of his second
child, Skinner built an air crib for baby care in which the
infant, instead of staying in a tight crib wrapped in layers of
cloth, can lie with only a diaper on in an enclosed space which
is temperature-controlled and plastic-sheeted, thus allowing the
child greater freedom of movement. Many babies are now raised in
this way.
During the 1950s, stimulated by an interest in
psycho-pharmacology, Skinner studied operant behaviour of
psychotics at the Metropolitan State Hospital in Waltham, Mass.
For his systematic experiments on this type of behaviour,
Skinner designed his famous Skinner box, a compartment in which
a rat, by pressing a bar, learns to repeat the act because each
time he does so a pellet of food is received as a reward.
Skinner demonstrated that when these reinforcements accompany or
follow certain specific behaviour, learning occurs in the
experimental animal. Such a response, reinforced by food or
other means, is called operant behaviour and is distinguished
from respondent behaviour, which is elicited by a stimulus.
Skinner's main concern in studying operant behaviour and its
parameters was neither "with the causal continuity between
stimulus and response, nor with the intervening variables, but
simply with the correlation between stimulus (S) and response
(R)."
Two Important Books
Skinner's books Verbal Behaviour (1957), while omitting the
citation of experimental evidence for its assertions, gives a
highly objective functional account of language, with the basic
unit of analysis being the verbal operant. He explains how
differential social reinforcement from other members of the
speech community forms, strengthens, or weakens dependency
relations between stimulus variables and verbal responses.
Included also are discussions of how listener "belief" is
fortified by reinforced responses to a speaker's words; how the
metaphorical expressions of a speaker reflect the kinds of
stimuli which control his behavior; how and why it is that we
cease verbalizing; suggestions regarding the nature of aphasia;
and logical and scientific verbal behaviour.
In Schedules of Reinforcement (1957) Skinner and his coauthors
reported on a research program that was "designed to evaluate
the extent to which an organism's own behaviour enters into the
determination of its subsequent behaviour." They demonstrated
that response rates, temporal patterns of rates, and patterning
of rate in the temporal vicinity of the reinforcer are dependent
upon the schedule of reinforcement. No detailed quantitative
laws emerge, however, from their 70,000 hours of data gathering.
Schedules is suggestive regarding the power of the operant as a
tool to investigate psychopharmacological and neurophysiological
problems.
Skinner acknowledged Roger Bacon as an influence on his thinking
and formulating. Skinner said that he emulated him because Bacon
rejected verbal authority; studied and asked questions of
phenomena rather than of those who had studied the phenomena;
classified in order to reveal properties; recognized that
experimentation included all contingencies, whereas mere
observation overstresses stimuli; and realized that if nature
can be commanded, it must also be obeyed.
Critics of operationism maintained that it disregarded problems
such as motives, personality, thought, and purpose or greatly
diminished their relevance or importance. Although Skinner dealt
with complex psychological problems, his mode of treatment of
these problems was criticized as having been seriously limited.
His basic behaviourist viewpoint itself has been questioned
recently, in part because it rejects consciousness. The concept
of consciousness cannot be omitted from psychology without a
serious loss in explaining much that man does - since the
viewpoint is completely indifferent to introspection.
On August 18, 1990 Skinner died and was buried at the Mt. Auburn
Cemetary in Massachussetts. He left behind many distinctive
awards and achievements. In 1968 he was awarded the National
Medal of Science, in 1971 he was honoured with the Joseph P.
Kennedy, Jr. Foundation Award, and in 1985 was given the Albert
Einstein School of Medecine award for excellence in psychiatry.
Skinner continued to write throughout his later years, authoring
such works as Enjoy Old Age (1983), Upon Further Reflection
(1986), and Recent Issues in the Analysis of Behaviour.
~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~
Burrhus Frederick Skinner pioneered the science of behavioural
analysis and positive reinforcement as an educational tool.
Skinner grew up in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, a small railroad
town thirty miles from the New York state line. His father was
an ambitious lawyer for the Erie railroad; his mother, a
civic-minded woman that continually reminded Frederick to be
aware of "what other people think." Despite his mother's
strictures, young Skinner enjoyed his Susquehanna boyhood,
roamed the countryside, built ingenious gadgets, and did well in
school. In 1922 he was valedictorian of his high school class,
having gained a reputation for debating intellectual matters
with his teachers. That year he enrolled in Hamilton College,
just outside Utica, New York, where he spent a miserable first
year as he lacked athletic ability and connections with Hamilton
alumni. In his second year, however, he entered a social circle
at Hamilton that appreciated intellectual and artistic life. He
began writing short stories; one was praised by poet Robert
Frost.
Graduating in 1926, Skinner, against the advice of his parents,
decided to spend the next year becoming a writer. He moved into
their house in Scranton where his father had taken a position as
general counsel for a coal company. It was Skinner's "dark year"
as he discovered he had "nothing to say" as a writer. But he was
drawn toward behavioural psychology, having read philosopher
Bertram Russell's favourable review of John B. Watson's
Behaviourism (1928). After a short fling with bohemian life in
Greenwich Village, Skinner enrolled in graduate school at
Harvard University in the psychology department.
Behavioural Analysis
Skinner, however, was not attracted to psychology at Harvard so
much as to the physiology of Professor William Crozier, a
student of German physiologist Jacque Loeb. Loeb and Crozier
insisted that real science depended on controlling experimental
results rather than mere observation of the phenomena being
studied. For Skinner the foundation of behavioural analysis
became the control of experimental variables. By 1930 he had
devised an apparatus to control a specific behaviour of a rat.
Starting with a runway resembling a rat maze, Skinner gradually
fashioned a box with a lever that delivered a food pellet when
the rat pushed it. He also invented the cumulative recorder, a
kymograph-like device that marked a paper every time the rat
pressed the lever. He allowed the rat (only one to a box) to be
fed a pellet only after it pressed a certain number of times, a
behaviour control known as schedules of reinforcement. He was
able to shape lever-pressing behaviour so that every time a rat
was put on a particular schedule of reinforcement the rate of
lever pressing remained constant. The measured behaviour was as
regular as a pulse beat and marked the beginning of the science
of behavioural analysis.
Skinner took great pains to distinguish his science from the
stimulus-response conditioning of Ivan Pavlov. The latter
conditioned surgically altered dogs. He measured the increase in
saliva flow (the response) when a bell was rung (the stimulus)
before feeding. Skinner, on the other hand, always used intact
organisms (either rats or pigeons), and was only concerned with
lever-pressing behaviour, never glandular secretion. He
acknowledged Pavlov's pioneering work in reinforcement and
conditioning but insisted that the science of behavioural
analysis involved operant conditioning. By 1933 he admitted that
there were a multitude of rat behaviors that were not
conditioned in what became known as the Skinner Box. The rat ran
about, stood on hind legs, sniffed, and so forth. But the
operation (operant) of lever-pushing was controlled by the
schedule of rein-forcement - not immediately by the food itself
but by the sound of the magazine as it dropped the pellet. Hence
although stimulus and response could not always be identified,
let alone controlled, the operant or behaviour of lever-pressing
could be. The rat was not conditioned, only one class of rat
behavior was.
The Behavior of Organisms (1938) clearly established operant
behavioural analysis as a new science. Had he only been
exclusively concerned with the behavior of rats and pigeons,
Skinner would have already secured a significant place in the
history of science. But he became a social inventor whose
creations (both mechanical and literary) made him one of the
most controversial scientists of the twentieth century. The
Behaviour of Organisms announced Skinner's vision for the future
of behavioural analysis: "The importance of a science of
behaviour derives largely from the possibility of an extension
to human affairs" (pp. 441-42). Ultimately this extension would
impact American education.
Social Service
Upon leaving Harvard in 1936 (he received his doctorate in 1933
but continued as a junior fellow) Skinner married Yvonne (Eve)
Blue after accepting a position at the University of Minnesota.
There he began to transfer operant science to social service.
During World War II Skinner and a team of students developed a
guidance system for bomb-carrying missiles. A pigeon was
conditioned through positive reinforcement to peck the aiming
device. But the army deemed "Project Pigeon" unfeasible for
wartime use. Disappointed but not discouraged, Skinner moved
more directly into a career as a social inventor. He turned his
attention to building a baby-tender, later trademarked the
aircrib, for his youngest daughter, Deborah.
The contraption was a carefully designed enclosed space,
thermostatically controlled to allow the infant to move freely
without constraining clothes. The child could be removed from
the baby-tender at any time. It also freed the mother from
constant vigilance over the baby because the infant was much
more secure than in a conventional crib. Skinner did not do
operant experiments on Deborah in the baby-tender; rather, it
was designed to improve the quality of life for both mother and
child. After an article in Life magazine, the baby-tender was
immediately criticized as another Skinner Box, one that
imprisoned the child and destroyed the intimate mother-child
relationship. For the first time Skinner's fascination with
social invention had thrust him into national limelight and
controversy.
Thereafter Skinner became evermore controversial as he moved
aggressively into the possibilities for using operant science to
build a better world. Walden Two (1948) envisioned a planned
environment that shaped the behaviours of a community using
operant techniques of positive reinforcement. Community
cooperation and welfare were seemingly naturally conditioned and
destructive competition disappeared. The novel met fierce
critical commentary as many Americans thought it a grotesque
distortion of Henry David Thoreau's Walden. Nonetheless by the
late 1960s the book became a best-seller and several actual
communities were established modelled after the fictional Walden
Two.
Educational Reform
Leaving the University of Minnesota in 1945, Skinner spent three
years at Indiana University before returning to Harvard in 1948.
In November 1953 he visited a Cambridge school where Deborah was
a student and was appalled by the mathematics instruction.
Students were given problems to solve while the teacher walked
up and down the aisles, helping some but ignoring others. Some
students finished quickly and fidgeted; others struggled. Graded
papers were returned days later. Skinner thought there must be a
better way and immediately fashioned a crude teaching machine by
cutting up manila folders. The manila folder effort evolved into
a slider machine used mostly for arithmetic and spelling. Math
problems, for example, were printed on cards that students
placed in the machine. The right answer caused a light to appear
in a hole in the card. Later he made a device that allowed
students to compose answers to questions on a tape that emerged
from the machine. Later still, students could compose answers on
cardboard disks. A lever was moved that covered the student's
answer with a Plexiglas plate - an innovation that prevented
altering the answer and also revealed the correct one. Students
mostly answered correctly because questions were designed
sequentially from simple to complex. This "programmed
instruction" was engineered with positive reinforcement coming
from correctly answering the questions. With few mistakes the
student progressed rapidly toward mastering arithmetic and
spelling. Hence, learning behaviours were shaped by immediate
positive reinforcement.
Skinner did not invent the first teaching machine and gave full
credit to Sidney Pressey of Ohio State University who had
developed a revolving drum device in 1926. Pressey's machine
allowed students to press one of four buttons that revealed the
correct or incorrect answer - in effect a multiple choice test.
Skinner's machines, however, facilitated programmed instruction
designed as sequential positive reinforcement. The teaching
machine simply transferred immediate positive reinforcement to
the mastery of subject matter. One teacher could not possibly
immediately reinforce twenty or thirty students in a classroom.
What was needed in American education was a technology that
incorporated operant conditioning to shaping the learning
behaviour of each individual student. Skinner assembled a group
of former students and colleagues to produce programmed
instruction across of full spectrum of subject matter. He
convinced companies such as IBM and Rheem to develop prototype
teaching machines that could be mass produced. He hoped for a
revolution in American education that he described in Technology
of Teaching (1968).
But the companies refused to aggressively market the machines
and educational leaders, most notably former Harvard President
James Bryant Conant, though initially enthusiastic, lost
interest. IBM and Rheem could make more money on safer
investments, while Conant believed the machines and programmed
instruction had not proved their viability to educational
experts in each subject area. Then, too, the fears of school
administrators and teachers over losing control of a
traditionally structured classroom, and perhaps also their jobs,
dampened enthusiasm for the teaching machine and programmed
instruction. The failure of his teaching machine to become as
common as automobiles and televisions was Skinner's most bitter
disappointment as a social inventor. He fervently believed that
the survival of American culture depended upon a revolution in
education. With population growth threatening to overwhelm the
ability of people to avoid catastrophic wars and ecological
disasters, only a technology of teaching incorporating
behavioural science could properly educate a citizenry capable
of effectively coping with an enveloping ominous world.
Beyond Freedom and Dignity (1971) was Skinner's last and most
controversial social statement. He attacked what he believed
were the fictions of individual freedom and autonomous man.
Every person was under the control of his or her evolutionary,
cultural, and immediate operant or behavioural contingencies.
What was needed was not only a frank admission of this reality,
but the application of the science of behavioural analysis to
social problems - most importantly to the obvious failure of
U.S. schools. But the critics and the public read the word
beyond in the book title as in place of and were enraged.
Skinner made the cover of Time with the inscription, "B. F.
Skinner Says We Can't Afford Freedom." He was bewildered by the
firestorm of criticism and spent his remaining years answering
critics and defending behavioural analysis. He never quite
understood the historical entrenchment of treasured American
values such as freedom and autonomy. Nonetheless, the
alternative road for American schools that Skinner, a great and
provocative thinker-inventor, devised remains an important
contribution to the field of education.
JACANA HOME PAGE
|
CLASSIC VIDEO CLIPS
|
JACANA ASTRONOMY SITE
JACANA PHOTO LIBRARY |
OLD MAUN PHOTO GALLERY |
MAUN PHONE DIRECTORY
FREE FONTS |
PIC OF THE DAY
|
GENERAL LIBRARY |
MAP LIBRARY |
TECHNICAL LIBRARY
HOUSE PLANS LIBRARY
|
MAUN E-MAIL, WEBSITE & SKYPE LIST
|
BOTSWANA GPS CO-ORDINATES
MAUN SAFARI WEB LINKS |
FREE SOFTWARE |
JACANA WEATHER PAGE
JACANA CROSSWORD LIBRARY |
JACANA CARTOON PAGE |
DEMOTIVATIONAL POSTERS
This web page was last updated on:
16 December, 2008
              |