|
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
1870 -
1924

Driven by ideological zeal, he reshaped Russia and made
communism into a potent global force
By DAVID REMNICK for Time Magazine
Not long
after the Bolsheviks had seized power in 1917, Vladimir Ilyich
Lenin filled out a bureaucratic questionnaire. For occupation,
he wrote "man of letters." So it was that a son of the Russian
intelligentsia, a radical straight from the pages of
Dostoyevsky's novel The Possessed, became the author of mass
terror and the first concentration camps ever built on the
European Continent.
Lenin was the initiator of the central drama — the tragedy — of
our era, the rise of totalitarian states. A bookish man with a
scholar's habits and a general's tactical instincts, Lenin
introduced to the 20th century the practice of taking an
all-embracing ideology and imposing it on an entire society
rapidly and mercilessly; he created a regime that erased
politics, erased historical memory, erased opposition. In his
short career in power, from 1917 until his death in 1924, Lenin
created a model not merely for his successor, Stalin, but for
Mao, for Hitler, for Pol Pot.
And while in this way Lenin may be the central actor who begins
the 20th century, he is the least knowable of characters. As a
boy growing up in Simbirsk, Lenin distinguished himself in Latin
and Greek. The signal event of his youth — the event that
radicalized him — came in 1887, when his eldest brother
Alexander, a student at the University of St. Petersburg, was
hanged for conspiring to help assassinate Czar Alexander III. As
a lawyer, Lenin became increasingly involved in radical
politics, and after completing a three-year term of Siberian
exile, he began his rise as the leading communist theorist,
tactician and party organizer.
In his personal relations with colleagues, family and friends,
Lenin was relatively open and generous. Unlike many tyrants, he
did not crave a tyrant's riches. Even when we strip Lenin of the
cult that was created all around him after his death, when we
strip away the myths of his "superhuman kindness," he remains a
peculiarly modest figure who wore a shabby waistcoat, worked
16-hour days and read extensively. (By contrast, Stalin did not
know that the Netherlands and Holland were the same country, and
no one in the Kremlin inner circle was brave enough to set him
straight.)
Before he became the general of the revolution, Lenin was its
pedant, the journalist-scholar who married Marxist theory to an
incisive analysis of insurrectionist tactics. His theories of
what society ought to be and how that ideal must be achieved
were the products of thousands of hours spent reading.
"The incomprehensibility of Lenin is precisely this
all-consuming intellectuality — the fact that from his
calculations, from his neat pen, flowed seas of blood, whereas
by nature this was not an evil person," writes Andrei Sinyavsky,
one of the key dissidents of the 1960s. "On the contrary,
Vladimir Ilyich was a rather kind person whose cruelty was
stipulated by science and incontrovertible historical laws. As
were his love of power and his political intolerance."
For all his learning, Lenin began the Bolshevik tradition of
waging war on intellectual dissidents — of exiling, imprisoning
and executing thinkers and artists who dared oppose the regime.
He was a "man of letters" of a particular sort. In the years
before and after the October 1917 coup, Lenin was the avatar of
a group of radical intellectuals who sought a revolution that
did not merely attempt to redress the economic balances under
czarism. Instead, Lenin made a perverse reading of the
Enlightenment view of man as modeling clay and sought to create
a new model of human nature and behavior through social
engineering of the most radical kind.
"Bolshevism was the most audacious attempt in history to subject
the entire life of a country to a master plan," writes Richard
Pipes at the end of his two-volume history of the revolution.
"It sought to sweep aside as useless rubbish the wisdom that
mankind had accumulated over millennia. In that sense, it was a
unique effort to apply science to human affairs: and it was
pursued with the zeal characteristic of the breed of
intellectuals who regard resistance to their ideas as proof that
they are sound."
It is, perhaps, impossible to calculate just how many tens of
millions of murders "flowed" from Leninism. Certainly Stalin
differed from Lenin in the length of his time as dictator — some
25 years to Lenin's six — and he also had the advantage of
greater technology. As a result, Stalin's murderous statistics
are superior to Lenin's. And yet Lenin contributed so very much.
In some scholarly circles in the West, Stalin was seen as an
"aberration," a tyrant who perverted Lenin's intentions at the
end of Lenin's life. But as more and more evidence of Lenin's
cruelty emerged from the archives, that notion of the "good
Lenin" and the "bad Stalin" became an academic joke. Very few of
Stalin's policies were without roots in Leninism: it was Lenin
who built the first camps; Lenin who set off artificial famine
as a political weapon; Lenin who disbanded the last vestige of
democratic government, the Constituent Assembly, and devised the
Communist Party as the apex of a totalitarian structure; Lenin
who first waged war on the intelligentsia and on religious
believers, wiping out any traces of civil liberty and a free
press.
Since the Soviet archives became public, we have been able to
read the extent of Lenin's cruelty, the depths of its vehemence.
Here he is in 1918, in a letter instructing Bolshevik leaders to
attack peasant leaders who did not accept the revolution:
"Comrades! ... Hang (hang without fail, so that people will see)
no fewer than one hundred known kulaks, rich men, bloodsuckers
... Do it in such a way that ... for hundreds of versts around,
the people will see, tremble, know, shout: 'They are strangling
and will strangle to death the bloodsucker kulaks' ... Yours,
Lenin."
Among those artists and writers who survived the revolution and
its aftermath, many wrote paeans to Lenin's intelligence that
sound like nothing so much as religious songs of praise. The
poet Mayakovsky would write, "Then over the world loomed/ Lenin
of the enormous head." And later, the prose writer Yuri Olesha
would say, "Now I live in an explained world. I understand the
causes. I am filled with a feeling of enormous gratitude,
expressible only in music, when I think of those who died to
make the world explained."
By the Brezhnev era, Lenin's dream state had devolved into a
corrupt and failing dictatorship. Only the Lenin cult persisted.
The ubiquitous Lenin was a symbol of the repressive society
itself. Joseph Brodsky, the great Russian poet of the late 20th
century, began to hate Lenin at about the time he was in the
first grade, "not so much because of his political philosophy or
practice ... but because of the omnipresent images which plagued
almost every textbook, every class wall, postage stamps, money,
and what not, depicting the man at various ages and stages of
his life ... This face in some ways haunts every Russian and
suggests some sort of standard for human appearance because it
is utterly lacking in character ... coming to ignore those
pictures was my first lesson in switching off, my first attempt
at estrangement."
When Mikhail Gorbachev instituted his policy of glasnost in the
late 1980s, the Communist Party tried to practice a policy of
regulated criticism. The goal was to "de-Stalinize" the Soviet
Union, to resume Khrushchev's liberalization in the late 1950s.
But eventually, glasnost led to the image of Lenin, not least
with the publication of Vassily Grossman's Forever Flowing, a
novel that dared compare Lenin's cruelty to Hitler's. While he
was in office, Gorbachev always called himself a "confirmed
Leninist"; it was only years later when he too--the last General
Secretary of the Communist Party--admitted, "I can only say that
cruelty was the main problem with Lenin."
After the collapse of the coup in August 1991, the people of
Leningrad voted to call their city St. Petersburg once more.
When Brodsky, who had been exiled from the city in 1964, was
asked about the news, he smiled and said, "Better to have named
it for a saint than a devil."
~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~<"((((((><~~~
(b.
Simbirsk, Russia, 22 Apr. 1870; d. Gorki, near Moscow, 21 Jan.
1924) Founder and leader of the Bolshevik Party, chair of
Council of People's Commissars 1917 – 24 Vladimir Ul'yanov came
from a provincial middle-class family of mixed ancestry
(Russian-Kalmyk and Jewish-German), his father being a school
inspector (hence in the minor nobility). Soon after his father's
death in 1886 Lenin's elder brother Alexander, a student, was
hanged for participating in a plot by a revolutionary populist
group to assassinate Alexander III. This event made a deep
impression on the younger Ul'yanov and, after passing his final
school exams with distinction, he too joined a populist group
when he began studying at Kazan University, for which he was
rusticated. His mother bought an estate in Samara province, but
there too he joined a populist group, although he became
increasingly interested in Marxism. He completed a first class
degree in law at St Petersburg University as an external student
in 1891. After a period as an assistant advocate in Samara he
moved in 1893 to St Petersburg, where he joined the Marxists. In
1895 he was sent to Geneva to make contact with Plekhanov's
group. Soon after he returned he was imprisoned and in 1897
sentenced to Siberian exile. While in Siberia he married
Nadezhda Krupskaya and completed, in 1899, his first major work
The Development of Capitalism in Russia in which he argued that
Russia had irrevocably embarked on the capitalist road and
rejected populism (though his ideas on revolutionary
organization remained influenced by it). After his release in
1900 he joined Plekhanov in Switzerland and, now using the
pseudonym Lenin, with him launched the newspaper Iskra ("The
Spark"), in which they attacked the "Economists" (supporters of
incremental reform). In 1902 Lenin published his notorious
pamphlet What is to be done? in which he argued that a
successful revolutionary party in Russian conditions had to be a
highly centralized and conspiratorial organization of
"professional revolutionaries" to be an effective vanguard of
the workers who would not spontaneously develop revolutionary
consciousness. This novel view of the Marxist Party provoked
considerable opposition. At the 2nd Congress of the RSDLP, held
in Brussels and London in 1903, Martov's more moderate views on
the party won the day, but Lenin's group, with the support of
Plekhanov, won the elections to the central party bodies. Lenin
termed his group the "Majoritarians" (Bolsheviki) and Martov's
group "Minoritarians" (Mensheviki) and increasingly treated his
group as the real party.
The revolutionary events of 1905 in Russia caught Lenin
unawares, like most other exiled socialists, and he returned to
Russia only in November. In his work Two Tactics of Social
Democracy in the Democratic Revolution he argued that the
workers would have to take a leading role in the bourgeois
revolution, co-operating with revolutionary elements in the
peasantry. This latter point was unusual in Marxist thinking,
perhaps showing underlying populist influence on Lenin. He made
some moves towards reconciliation with the Mensheviks, putting
forward the idea of "democratic centralism", in which his 1902
model of the party was modified by emphasis on the democratic
electivity and accountability of the leadership. But, once in
exile again in 1907, he resumed his policy of promoting schisms,
designed to strengthen the revolutionary vanguard. Differences
with the Mensheviks continued to widen, now reflecting
disagreement on the whole approach to revolution, and the split
became final in 1912. He spent the war years mainly in
Switzerland, arguing for turning the imperialist war into a
revolutionary civil war. In Imperialism (written 1916) he argued
that the capitalist powers were driven into territorial
imperialism by capital export and used the "super-profits"
derived from colonial exploitation to bribe the working class
into quiescence by wage increases and social benefits, but that
Russia, though less developed, could be the "weakest link" from
which general revolution might develop.
Lenin, like other socialists, was surprised by the February
Revolution in Russia and the consequent abdication of the Tsar.
He obtained German permission to travel across Germany in a
sealed train to Russia (where the Germans hoped his anti-war
propaganda would help undermine the Russian war effort).
Arriving in Petrograd (as St Petersburg had been renamed) in
April 1917, he brought out his April Theses in which he
disconcerted the more gradualist domestic Bolsheviks by urging
non-cooperation with the Provisional Government, rejection of
any participation in the war, and active propaganda work in the
soviets to achieve a Bolshevik-dominated soviet government which
would create a revolutionary state. It took some months before
these tactics paid off, but gradually the effectiveness of
Bolshevik propaganda (with slogans like "Bread", "Peace",
"Land") combined with the ineffectiveness of the provisional
government and its continuance of the war compromised the
Mensheviks and Socialist Revolutionaries who took part in it and
increased Bolshevik support in the Soviets. After a near
catastrophic premature uprising in July (as a result of which
Lenin was forced to go into hiding in Finland) Bolshevik
fortunes rose again because of their role in foiling Kornilov's
attempted coup in August. In his work The State and Revolution,
which appeared in the summer of 1917, Lenin argued that the
bourgeois state had to be smashed and a "dictatorship of the
proletariat" established which would move rapidly to create a
new order, though this was not considered an immediate prospect.
However, by October the popular revolutionary mood was
intensifying, the Bolsheviks gained majorities in many of the
town and military soviets, and Trotsky and his group had come
over to the Bolsheviks. Lenin returned on 10 October and urged
an immediate armed uprising against the provisional government.
Masterminded by Trotsky, the seizure of power was effected on
the night of 25 – 6 October in the name of the All-Russian
Congress of Soviets, to which Lenin announced the setting up of
a Council of People's Commissars, led by himself. However,
contrary to the expectations of many, Lenin refused to share
power with other socialists, though a few left-wing socialist
revolutionaries were given minor posts. Some revolutionary
decrees were quickly issued: the Decree on Peace withdrew Russia
from the war; the Decree on Land sanctioned the peasant takeover
of the estates; other decrees separated church and state and
established workers' control in the factories (soon to be
reversed); the armed forces were disbanded and a voluntary
militia established. However, opposition soon made itself felt
and Lenin was forced in December to create the Cheka, a secret
police force, and to place "temporary" bans on non-Bolshevik
newspapers and parties. Elections were held for the Constituent
Assembly on universal suffrage in November, in which the
Bolsheviks gained 24 per cent of the votes and the Socialist
Revolutionaries 40 per cent. When the Assembly met in January
and voiced strong criticisms of the Bolshevik government, it was
not allowed to reconvene, an important symbolic act in the
creation of the one-party state. In March 1918 Lenin was forced
to sign the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, a separate peace with
Germany and Austria, ceding huge amounts of territory, including
the Ukraine. The Left SRs then resigned from the government and
started resistance, soon afterwards foreign forces intervened
and the civil war started. There developed a highly
authoritarian and centralized system of rule known as "War
Communism": all industrial enterprises were nationalized, all
non-Bolshevik activity treated as counter-revolution, the
economy run by central command, and military and civilian
conscription employed. By 1920 the war was over, but with the
economy in a state of collapse and millions dead. Following
Trotsky's suggestion, Lenin introduced in March 1921 the New
Economic Policy, a "breathing-space", though one that he thought
could last for "a generation", involving denationalization of
small-scale enterprises and restoration of an agricultural
market. At the same time political discipline was increased with
a ban on factional activity in the party and the maintenance of
bans on non-Bolshevik parties and media. This "tactical retreat"
rapidly revived the economy. But Lenin's health was now bad:
after surviving an assassination attempt in 1918 he had his
first stroke in 1921 and was more or less incapacitated from
1922. His last struggles were against the rising tide of
bureaucracy (but his solution was a bureaucratic one — still
more committees, like Rabkrin) and to prevent Stalin gaining
power after his death (but his recommendation for Stalin's
removal as General Secretary was suppressed). He died at the age
of 53 in January 1924, his weak constitution broken by overwork.
Lenin had been obsessed with achieving socialist revolution in
Russia, for which end he considered any means justified,
including terror and deceit, and did not appreciate the
long-term dangers of such methods. His emphasis on central
direction and the party's vanguard role ("We know best what's
good for you") never changed, despite the broadening of party
membership, and produced the dangers of "substitutism" about
which Trotsky warned. Once revolution was achieved he seemed
trapped in short-term tactical changes, unclear about long-term
strategy. Undoubtedly an outstanding political leader whose
personal contribution changed the face of the twentieth century,
his dogmatism and ruthlessness, even though partly compensated
by approachability and rejection of hero-worship, provided a
precedent for the excesses of Stalin.
==================================================
The Russian statesman Vladimir Ilich Lenin (1870-1924) was the
creator of the Bolshevik party, the Soviet state, and the Third
International. He was a successful revolutionary leader and an
important contributor to revolutionary socialist theory.
Few events have shaped contemporary history as profoundly as the
Russian Revolution and the Communist revolutions that followed
it. Each one of them was made in the name of V. I. Lenin, his
doctrines, and his political practices. Contemporary thinking
about world affairs has been greatly influenced by Lenin's
impetus and contributions. From Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points
to today's preoccupation with wars of national liberation,
imperialism, and decolonization, many important issues of
contemporary social science were first raised or disseminated by
Lenin; even some of the terms he used have entered into
everyone's vocabulary. The very opposition to Lenin often takes
Leninist forms.
Formative Years
V. I. Lenin was born in Simbirsk (today Ulianovsk) on April 10
(Old Style), 1870. His real family name was Ulianov, and his
father, Ilia Nikolaevich Ulianov, was a high official in the
czarist educational bureaucracy who had risen into the nobility.
Vladimir received the conventional education given to the sons
of the Russian upper class but turned into a radical dissenter.
One impetus to his conversion doubtless was the execution by
hanging of his older brother Alexander in 1887; Alexander and a
few associates had conspired to assassinate the Emperor. Lenin
graduated from secondary school with high honors, enrolled at
Kazan University, but was expelled after participating in a
demonstration. He retired to the family estate but was permitted
to continue his studies in absentia. He obtained a law degree in
1891.
When, in 1893, he moved to St. Petersburg, Lenin was already a
Marxist and a revolutionary by profession, joining like-minded
intellectuals in study groups, writing polemical pamphlets and
articles, and seeking to organize workers. The St. Petersburg
Union for the Struggle for the Liberation of Labor, which Lenin
helped create, was one of the important nuclei of the Russian
Marxist movement. The most important work from this period is a
lengthy pamphlet, "What Are the 'Friends of the People,' and How
Do They Fight against Social-Democracy?" In it Lenin presents
the essentials of his entire outlook.
In 1897 Lenin was arrested, spent some months in jail, and was
finally sentenced to 3 years of exile in the Siberian village of
Shushenskoe. He was joined there by a fellow Marxist, Nadezhda
Konstantinovna Krupskaya, whom he married in 1898. In his
Siberian exile he produced a major study of the Russian economy,
The Development of Capitalism in Russia, in which he sought to
demonstrate that, despite its backwardness, the economy of his
country had definitely transformed itself into a capitalist one.
If Lenin had produced nothing else than this learned though
controversial work, he would today be known as one of the
leading Russian economists of his period.
Emigration to Europe
Not long after his release from Siberia in the summer of 1900,
Lenin moved to Europe, where he spent most of the next 17 years,
moving from one country to another at frequent intervals,
periods of feverish activity alternating with those of total
frustration. His first step was to join the editorial board of
Iskra (>The Spark), then the central newspaper of Russian
Marxism, where he served together with the top leaders of the
movement. After parting from Iskra, he edited a succession of
papers of his own and contributed to other socialist journals.
His journalistic activity was closely linked with organizational
work, partly because the underground organizational network
within Russia to some extent revolved around the distribution of
clandestine literature.
Organizational activity, in turn, was linked with the selection
and training of personnel. For some time Lenin conducted a
training school for Russian revolutionaries at Longjumeau, a
suburb of Paris. A perennial problem was that of financing the
movement and its leaders' activities in their European exile.
Lenin personally could usually depend on financial support from
his mother; but her pension could not pay for his political
activities. Much of the early history of Russian Marxism can be
understood only in the light of these pressing money problems.
His Thought
A Marxist movement had developed in Russia only during the last
decade of the 19th century as a response to the rapid growth of
industry, urban centres, and a proletariat. Its first
intellectual spokesmen were people who had turned away from
populism (narodnichestvo), which they regarded as a failure.
Instead of relying on the peasantry, they placed their hopes on
the workers as the revolutionary class. Rejecting the village
socialism preached by the Narodniks, they opted for
industrialization, modernization, and Westernization. Their
immediate aim they declared to be a bourgeois revolution which
would transform Russia into a democratic republic.
In accepting this revolutionary scenario, Lenin added the
important proviso that hegemony in the coming bourgeois
revolution should remain with the proletariat as the most
consistently revolutionary of all classes.
At the same time, Lenin, more than most Marxists, made a clear
distinction between the workers' movement, on the one hand, and
the theoretical contribution to be made by intellectuals, on the
other. Of the two, he considered the theoretical contribution
the more important, the workers' movement being a merely
spontaneous reaction to capitalist exploitation, whereas theory
was an expression of consciousness, meaning science and
rationality. Throughout his life Lenin insisted that
consciousness must maintain leadership over spontaneity for
revolutionary Marxism to succeed. This implies that the
intellectual leaders must prepare the proletariat for its
political tasks and must guide it in its action. Leadership and
hierarchy thus become key concepts in the Leninist vocabulary,
and the role and structure of the party must conform to this
conception. The party is seen as the institutionalization of
true consciousness. It must turn into the general staff of the
revolution, subjecting the working class and indeed all its own
members to command and discipline.
Lenin expressed these ideas in his important book What's To Be
Done? (1902), the title of the work expressing his indebtedness
to Nikolai Chernyshevsky. When, in 1903, the leaders of Russian
Marxism met for the first important party congress, formally the
Second Congress, these ideas clashed head on with the conception
of a looser, more democratic workers' party advanced by Lenin's
old friend luli Martov. This disagreement over the nature and
organization of the party was complicated by numerous other
conflicts of view, and from its first important congress Russian
Marxism emerged split into two factions. The one led by Lenin
called itself the majority faction (bolsheviki); the other got
stuck with the name of minority faction (mensheviki). Lenin's
reaction to the split was expressed in his pamphlet "One Step
Forward - Two Steps Back," published in 1904.
Mensheviks and Bolsheviks disagreed not only over organizational
questions but also over most other political problems, including
the entire conception of a Marxist program for Russia and the
methods to be employed by the party. Bolshevism, in general,
stresses the need for revolution and the futility of incremental
reforms; it emphasizes the goals of Marxism rather than the
process, with its timetable, by which Marx thought the new order
was to be reached; in comparison to menshevism it is impatient,
pragmatic, and tough-minded.
The Revolution of 1905 surprised all Russian revolutionary
leaders, including the Bolsheviks. Lenin managed to return to
Russia only in November, when the defeat of the revolution was a
virtual certainty. But he was among the last to give up. For
many more months he urged his followers to renew their
revolutionary enthusiasm and activities and to prepare for an
armed uprising. For some time afterward the technology of
revolutionary warfare became the focus of his interest. His
militancy was expressed in an anti-Menshevik pamphlet published
in 1905, "Two Tactics of Social-Democracy in the Democratic
Revolution."
The major impact of the aborted revolution and its aftermath was
a decided change in Lenin's attitude toward the peasantry. Lenin
came to recognize it as a class in its own right - not just as a
rural proletariat - with its own interests, and as a valuable
ally for the revolutionary proletariat. His pamphlet "The
Agrarian Question in the Russian Revolution of 1905-7" presents
these new views in systematic fashion.
Bolshevism as an Independent Faction
In the 12 years between the Revolution of 1905 and that of 1917,
bolshevism, which had begun as a faction within the Russian
Social-Democratic Workers party, gradually emerged as an
independent party that had cut its ties with all other Russian
Marxists. The process entailed prolonged and bitter polemics
against Mensheviks as well as against all those who worked for a
reconciliation of the factions. It involved fights over funds,
struggles for control of newspapers, the development of rival
organizations, and meetings of rival congresses. Disputes
concerned many questions about the goals and strategies of the
movement, the role of national liberation movements within the
Marxist party, and also philosophic controversies. Lenin's
contribution to this last topic was published in 1909,
Materialism and Empirio-criticism.
Since about 1905 the international socialist movement had begun
also to discuss the possibility of a major war breaking out. In
its congresses of 1907 and 1912, resolutions were passed which
condemned such wars in advance and pledged the parties of the
proletariat not to support them. Lenin had wanted to go further
than that. He had urged active opposition to the war effort and
a transformation of any war into a proletarian revolution. He
called his policy "revolutionary defeatism." When World War I
broke out, most socialist leaders in the countries involved
supported the war effort. For Lenin, this was proof that he and
they shared no aims or views. The break between the two schools
of Marxism had become irreconcilable.
During the war Lenin lived in Switzerland. He attended several
conferences of radical socialists opposed to the war or even
agreeing with Lenin's revolutionary defeatism. He read
extensively on the Marxist theory of state and wrote a first
draft for a book on the subject, The State and Revolution. He
also immersed himself in literature dealing with contemporary
world politics and wrote a book which may, in the long run, be
his most important one, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of
Capitalism (1916), in which Marxism is effectively made
applicable to the 20th century. By the beginning of 1917 he had
fits of despondency and wrote to a close friend that he
despaired of ever witnessing another revolution. This was about
a month before the fall of czarism.
Lenin in 1917
It took a good deal of negotiation and courage for Lenin and a
group of like-minded Russian revolutionaries to travel from
Switzerland back to Russia through enemy country (Germany). Much
has been made of Lenin's negotiations with an enemy power and of
the fact that some Bolshevik activities were supported
financially by German intelligence agencies. There is no
convincing evidence, however, which might show that acceptance
of funds from objectionable sources made Lenin an agent of these
sources in anyway. And from his point of view the source of aid
was immaterial; what counted was the use to which it was put.
The man who returned to Russia in the famed "sealed train" in
the spring of 1917 was of medium height, quite bald, except for
the back of his head, with a reddish beard. The features of his
face were arresting - slanted eyes that looked piercingly at
others, and high cheek-bones under a towering forehead. The rest
of his appearance was deceptively ordinary: a man of resolute
movements clad quite conservatively in a middle-class suit.
Versed in many languages, Lenin spoke Russian with a slight
speech defect but was a powerful orator in small groups as well
as before mass audiences. A tireless worker, he made others work
tirelessly. Self-effacing, he sought to compel his collaborators
to devote every ounce of their energy to the revolutionary task
at hand. He was impatient with any extraneous activities,
including small talk and abstract theoretical discussions.
Indeed, he was suspicious of intellectuals and felt most at home
in the company of simple folk. Having been brought up in the
tradition of the Russian nobility, Lenin loved hunting, hiking,
horseback riding, boating, mush-rooming, and the outdoor life in
general. He sought to steel himself by systematic physical
exercise and generally forbade himself those hobbies which he
considered time-wasting or corrupting: chess, music, and
companionship. While his life-style was that of a dedicated
professional revolutionary, his tastes in art, morals, and
manners were rather conventional.
Once he had returned to Russia, Lenin worked feverishly and
relentlessly to utilize the revolutionary situation that had
been created by the fall of czarism so as to convert it into a
proletarian revolution which would bring his own party into
power. These were the crucial 6 months of his life, but space
does not permit a detailed account of his activities in the
period. The result of his activities is well known: Opinions in
Russia quickly became more and more polarized. Moderate forces
found themselves less and less able to maintain even the
pretense of control. In the end, the so-called provisional
government, then headed by Kerensky, simply melted away, and
power literally fell into the hands of the Bolsheviks. As a
result of this so-called October Revolution, Lenin found himself
not only the leader of his party but also the chairman of the
Council of People's Commissars (equivalent to premier minister)
of the newly proclaimed Russian Socialist Federative Soviet
Republic.
Ruler of Russia
During the first years of Lenin's rule as dictator of Russia,
the major task he faced was that of establishing his and his
party's authority in the country. Most of his policies can be
understood in this light, even though he alienated some elements
in the population while satisfying others. Examples are the
expropriation of landholdings for distribution to the peasants,
the separate peace treaty with Germany, and the nationalization
of banks and industrial establishments.
From 1918 to 1921 a fierce civil war raged which the Bolsheviks
finally won against seemingly overwhelming odds. During the
civil war Lenin tightened his party's dictatorship and
eventually eliminated all rival parties from the political
arena. A spirited defense of his dictatorship can be found in
his "The Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsky"
(1918), in which he answers criticism from some more moderate
Marxists. Lenin had to create an entirely new political system
with the help of inexperienced personnel; he was heading a
totally exhausted economy and had to devise desperate means for
mobilizing people for work. Simultaneously he created the Third
(Communist) International and vigorously promoted the spread of
the revolution to other countries; and meanwhile he had to cope
with dissent among his own party comrades, some of whom
criticized him from the left. The pamphlet "Left-wing Communism:
An Infantile Disorder" is a response to this criticism.
When the civil war had been won and the regime established
firmly, the economy was ruined, and much of the population was
bitterly opposed to the regime. At this point Lenin reversed
many of his policies and instituted a trenchant reform, called
the New Economic Policy. It signified a temporary retreat from
the goal of establishing communism at once and a resolve to make
do with the social forces available: the Communist party
declared itself ready to coexist and cooperate with features of
the past, such as free enterprise, capitalist institutions, and
capitalist states across the borders. For the time being, the
Soviet economy would be a mixture of capitalist and socialist
features. The stress of the party's policies would be on
economic reconstruction and on the education of a peasant
population for life in the 20th century. In the long run, Lenin
hoped that both these policies would make the blessings of
socialism obvious to all, so that the country would gradually
grow into socialism. The wariness, the caution, the fear of
excessive haste and impatience which Lenin showed in the years
1921-1923 are expressed only inadequately in the last few
articles he wrote, such as "On Cooperation," "How We Must
Reorganize the Workers and Peasants Inspectorate," and "Better
Less but Better."
In 1918 an assassin wounded Lenin; he recovered but may have
suffered some lasting damage. On May 26, 1922, he suffered a
serious stroke from which he recovered after some weeks, only to
suffer a second stroke on December 16. He was so seriously
incapacitated that he could participate in political matters
only intermittently and feebly. An invalid, he lived in a
country home at Gorki, near Moscow, where he died on Jan. 21,
1924. His body was preserved and is on view in the Lenin
Mausoleum outside the walls of the Moscow Kremlin.
JACANA HOME PAGE
|
CLASSIC VIDEO CLIPS
|
JACANA ASTRONOMY SITE
JACANA PHOTO LIBRARY |
OLD MAUN PHOTO GALLERY |
MAUN PHONE DIRECTORY
FREE FONTS |
PIC OF THE DAY
|
GENERAL LIBRARY |
MAP LIBRARY |
TECHNICAL LIBRARY
HOUSE PLANS LIBRARY
|
MAUN E-MAIL, WEBSITE & SKYPE LIST
|
BOTSWANA GPS CO-ORDINATES
MAUN SAFARI WEB LINKS |
FREE SOFTWARE |
JACANA WEATHER PAGE
JACANA CROSSWORD LIBRARY |
JACANA CARTOON PAGE |
DEMOTIVATIONAL POSTERS
This web page was last updated on:
12 December, 2008
              |