|
|
Print this page: File > Print > OK
Messier 73
Group or Asterism
of 4 Stars M73 (NGC 6994) in
Aquarius
| Right Ascension |
20 : 58.9 (h:m)
|
| Declination |
-12 : 38 (deg:m)
|
| Distance |
2.5 (kly)
|
| Visual Brightness |
9.0 (mag)
|
| Apparent Dimension |
2.8 (arc min)
|
Discovered 1780 by Charles Messier.
The object Messier 73 (M73, NGC 6994)) is a little conspicuous assortment
of four stars of 10th to 12th magnitude, situated in the very western part
of constellation Aquarius; its nature as a physical group is doubtful. It
lies only about 1.5 deg east of globular cluster
M72.
Although M73 is apparently consisted of 4 stars, 3 of them being of about
10th to 11th magnitude (Burnham and Kenneth Glyn Jones give A:10.5, B:10.5,
and C:11.0), the fourth (D) being of mag 12.0, it is obviously a true
Messier object.
Charles Messier found it on October 4, 1780,
described it as follows:
"Cluster of three or four small stars, which resembles a nebula at first
glance, containing very little nebulosity; this cluster is located on
the parallel [of declination] of the preceding [M 72]; its position has
been determined from the same star [Nu Aquarii]."
Apparently, this group found its way into Messier's catalog because he had
determined its position at the same time when measuring
M72, which is 1.5
degrees to the west. It may have been included because of its "first-glance
nebulous" appearance in Messier's instruments. Although it is clear from
this description that this group was what Messier had observed and measured,
some versions of Messier's catalog omit it as an "obscure" object. However,
John
Herschel has included it in his General Catalogue as GC 4617, and
J.L.E.
Dreyer included it in the NGC catalog as entry number 6994.
Consequently, this object has received little research interest.
Collinder (1931), who cataloged it as Cr 426, estimated its distance at
12,000 light-years, and from its 2.8' angular diameter, speculated if this
was an open or a globular cluster. It was also cataloged as C 2056-128 and
OCL 89 in more recent catalogs of open clusters.
Ruprecht
(1966) classified it as of Trumpler type IV 1 p, i.e. a very sparse and
poor open cluster which is not very well detached from the surrounding star
field.
Wielen (1971) considered it as doubtful, but classified it as an old and
nearby cluster.
What remains to clear up to now, at least to the knowledge of the present
author, is the check if the 4 stars in M73, or at least some of them, are
physically related. There was always a great fraction of astronomers who
believed that M73 is an asterism, a chance alignment of 4 stars at different
distances, but it would certainly be interesting to know if all or some of
the 4 stars form a physical system of some kind. As
Kenneth Glyn Jones
states: "This issue is perhaps a minor one, but every student of the Messier
catalog would be much interested in the outcome."
P. Murdin, D. Allen, and D. Malin, in their
Catalog of
the Universe, summarize the problem and give the following estimate
for the probability of M73 being an asterism or a physical multiple:
"[The authors] suspect in fact that M 73 might be a real little cluster,
for the following reason. On average there are 60 stars per square
degree which are brighter than magnitude 12, as are the four stars of M
73. The probability of finding four such stars by chance in a given area
of sky one arc minute across (like M 73) is about two chances in a
billion. However, there are 150 million such little areas on the sky, so
the chances are only one in four that such random asterism exists on the
sky. M 73 could be it, but we would gamble that it is a genuine multiple
star of some kind."
ESA's Hipparcos satellite has obtained measurements for the parallaxes of
two and for the proper motion of all four stars. Giovanni Carraro of the
University of Padua, Italy has tried to determine distances from these data,
and gives values of 137 and 440 and light-years for the brightest star GSC
05778-00802 and second-brightest HD 358033, respectively (Carraro
2000, see also Sky & Telescope of July 2000, p. 26).
Unfortunately, these results are of limited value only, as the famous and
otherwise extremely useful Hipparcos database has turned out to contain
systematical errors like nonsensial negative parallaxes, particularly for
closely neighbored stars, and therefore does not help very much in issues
like this.
JACANA ASTRONOMY SITE
|
SOLAR SYSTEM
|
STARS
|
GALAXIES
|
NEBULAE
SUPERNOVAE |
CLUSTERS |
DOUBLE STARS
|
COMETS
|
ASTEROIDS
|
DUST CLOUDS|
ILLUSTRATED MESSIER LIST
ASTRONOMY LINKS |
WHAT'S UP THIS MONTH |
INTERESTING ARTICLES |
ASTRO QUOTATIONS
HUBBLE
|
SPITZER
|
CHANDRA |
MOON PHASES
|
ASTRONOMICAL GLOSSARY
|
MESSIER LIST BY NUMBER
MOON RISE/SET/% TABLE |
SKYMAPS.COM SKY CHART FOR THIS MONTH
JACANA HOME PAGE
              |
|